Grizzlylaw | Subrogation and Health Insurance Liens. What are they and why do they matter?
2507
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-2507,single-format-standard,qode-social-login-1.0.1,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,footer_responsive_adv,qode-content-sidebar-responsive,transparent_content,qode-child-theme-ver-10.1.2.1492730960,qode-theme-ver-16.7,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.5.2,vc_responsive
 

Subrogation and Health Insurance Liens. What are they and why do they matter?

Subrogation and Health Insurance Liens. What are they and why do they matter?

An ordinary dictionary will define subrogation as the substitution of one party for another. And, that’s what it is; with a few technicalities, in the legal world.

As I understand it, for our purposes, the idea of substituting one party for another in the legal world began in England, not long after the insurance industry was born. Say a merchant ship was hijacked by an enemy country at sea. The ship and cargo is lost. There was insurance, and the insurance pays out.

[pullquote1 quotes=”true” variation=”coffee”]the idea of substituting one party for another in the legal world began in England[/pullquote1]A few months later, the ship is retrieved by the English navy. Who gets the cargo? The cargo’s owner or the insurance?

The insurance company’s ability to make a claim for the cargo became known as “subrogation.” Technically, the insurance had no right to even make a claim for the cargo because it did not own the cargo; however, since the insurance company paid money out to replace the cargo, it made sense for the insurance company to be able to make a claim for the cargo. So subrogation was the term used to give the insurance company a right to step into court and ask for some or all of the cargo.

Since we’re landlocked, we’re obviously not concerned about lost cargo at sea. Where the doctrine of subrogation usually comes up for us is health insurance. The typical situation is where we have an injured client. The client has health insurance which pays for some of the client’s medical expenses from the accident. The client then attempts to collect from the third-party who was responsible for the injuries.

The health insurance discovers that there might be payments from a third party and sends us a letter, notifying us that they have a right to subrogate – meaning they have a right to sue the third-party who caused the injuries – and telling us that they will claim a lien on any settlement or judgment in the amount of the medical expenses they paid. Essentially, they expect to be reimbursed for the amounts they paid for medical services related to the injury.

Rebecca J. Rutz
becky@grizzlylaw.com
2 Comments
  • Dominique Plassmann
    Posted at 03:58h, 20 March

    I tend not to drop a lot of responses, however i did a few searching and wound up here Subrogation and Health Insurance Liens. What are they and why do they matter? by Rebecca Rutz. And I do have some questions for you if it’s allright. Is it simply me or does it seem like a few of these comments appear like they are written by brain dead visitors? 😛 And, if you are writing at additional sites, I’d like to keep up with everything new you have to post. Could you make a list of every one of your community sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

    • Sandi Ko
      Posted at 11:17h, 21 March

      We do have an rss feed. Just click the RSS icon above the menu bar.

Post A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

By creating an account you are accepting our Terms & Conditions.