• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Grizzly Law

Grizzly Law

Kalispell Personal Injury Law Firm

  • Our Team
    • Lee Henning
    • Rebecca Henning-Rutz
    • Ashley McCormack
    • Cathy Kahnle
    • Melinda Cole
    • Keirsten Giles
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury Lawyer
    • Auto Accident
    • Motorcycle Accident
    • Slip and Fall
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Bicycle or Pedestrian Injury
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Social Security Disability
  • Educate
  • Contact
Start Here

Divorce-Cleaning Out the Bank Accounts

You are here: Home / Family Law / Divorce-Cleaning Out the Bank Accounts

by Kay Lynn Lee

Back in the good ol’ days. . .a party who decided to leave his or her spouse typically cleaned out the house, the cookie jar stash, and all the bank accounts and changed the names on all the property and accounts to ace the other party out.

Is that a good idea nowadays? NOT!!

And especially where the Court has issued its economic temporary restraining order (ETRO) in your dissolution matter. Under Montana law, specifically MCA (Montana Codes Annotated) §40-4-121(3), neither party can hypothecate (pledge to secure debt), conceal or dispose of any property nor can they cash, borrow against, cancel, transfer, dispose of or change the beneficiaries of insurance or other life, health, auto or disability coverage with only some exceptions, typically by agreement, the order of the Court or for absolute necessities (such as food, housing, and attorneys’ fees). The ETRO is issued by the Clerk of Court at the same time as the Summons in the dissolution, child custody, or support matter.

. . . any asset you have, even IRA and 401(k) accounts would be subject to division in a dissolution of your marriage. . .

Recall the Funk case (In re Marriage of Funk, 2012 MT 14) which clarified/overturned some 27 years of cases by establishing once and for all that marital assets can consist of just about anything acquired during the time the parties were married however acquired, i.e., whether earned, purchased, inherited or gifted and however titled. That means any asset you have, even IRA and 401(k) accounts would be subject to division in a dissolution of your marriage–just because it was “your” work and “your” company doesn’t mean your spouse would not be entitled to some portion based primarily on the length of the marriage.

The Montana Supreme Court just handed down a decision involving death benefits through a pension plan–specifically the Montana Public Employees Retirement Administration. In the case of Briese v. MPER Board, 2012 MT 192, a sheriff who had already filed for dissolution changed the beneficiary of his sheriff’s retirement system account, which included employment-related death benefits, from his wife to the couple’s two minor children. He did this despite the existing ETRO, without the permission of the Court in the dissolution matter and without any notice to or consent by Mrs. Briese.

Prior to the dissolution being finalized, Mr. Briese was killed in the line of duty; his widow was told by MPERA she could not collect the insurance proceeds, so she opted to secure the proceeds for the children via monthly payments. When she later sought to enforce the ETRO provisions of the dissolution, MPERA claimed she’d waived her right to collect the proceeds for herself. The Supreme Court held she had waived nothing by proceeding to follow MPERA’s instructions as her applying for benefits for her children in reliance upon MPERA’s information and instructions was not considered to be a “knowing and intentional relinquishment of a known right”.

Because Mr. Briese’s changing beneficiaries violated the ETRO, the District Court had the equitable power (Courts have two types of power: legal power involves awarding money damages and equitable power can require certain actions or inactions such as an injunction) to return Mrs. Briese to the status quo ante, i.e., putting her back as the primary beneficiary under the sheriff’s retirement system.

Remember, then, that cleaning out or changing accounts and beneficiaries or hiding money in violation of the ETRO can lead to other consequences, some rather, er uh, consequential.

Family Law child support,  client questions,  common questions,  Division property,  divorce,  ETRO,  family law,  insurance

Take the Next Step

Get the Answers You Need to Move Forward

The team at Grizzly Law can help you make sense of your legal issues so you can finally have clarity on how to move forward with your case. Talk to an attorney now.

Start Here

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Montana Laws Governing Cyclists and Roadway Bicycling
  • Can the insurance company refuse to pay for my rental car after an accident?
  • Remote Texting Liability – I Would Take The Case
  • Liability for Texting A Driver
  • Go Check Your Auto Insurance!

Grizzly Law

1131 S Main St
Kalispell 59901
Phone: (406) 752-7122
Fax: (406) 752-3367
Henning, Rutz, and McCormack PLLC BBB Business Review
Free Personal Injury Consultation

Turn Your Setbacks Into Comebacks

Meet with Grizzly Law for a free case review. We'll evaluate your personal injury case and provide recommendations on next steps to get you moving forward.

Get Help Now

Footer

Quick Links

  • Montana Car Accident Guide
  • Contact Us
  • Educate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer

Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Lawyer
  • Auto Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accident
  • Slip and Fall
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Bicycle or Pedestrian Injury
  • Family Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Social Security Disability

Contact Us

1131 S Main St
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 752-7122
Fax: (406) 752-3367
Legal Counsel and Prosecution in Kalispell

The information presented on this website is not intended as and should not be interpreted as legal advice or legal opinion. Do not act or rely upon the information on this website without seeking the advice of an attorney.

Copyright © 2021 Grizzly Law · All Rights Reserved · Made in Montana by UpStart Media