• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Grizzly Law

Grizzly Law

Kalispell Personal Injury Law Firm

  • Our Team
    • Lee Henning
    • Rebecca Henning-Rutz
    • Ashley McCormack
    • Cathy Kahnle
    • Melinda Cole
    • Keirsten Giles
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury Lawyer
    • Auto Accident
    • Motorcycle Accident
    • Slip and Fall
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Bicycle or Pedestrian Injury
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Social Security Disability
  • Educate
  • Contact
Start Here

Mortgage Servicer Did What

You are here: Home / Bankruptcy / Mortgage Servicer Did What

by Kay Lynn Lee

I FOLLOWED THE BANK’S ADVICE AND LOST MY HOUSE.

Imagine no longer being able to afford the mortgage you’ve paid for years because you lost your job.  As a result, foreclosure and losing your home is right around the corner.  The good news, like many banks, you qualify for federal assistance geared to help you stay in your home.  The bad news, you are unable to take advantage of the federal assistance due to the bank’s or mortgage servicer’s misconduct.

Federal assistance is available.  The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act were enacted in part to “protect home values” and “preserve homeownership.”  These Acts also provided the Secretary of the Treasury the authority under the Troubled Asset Purchase Program to purchase troubled assets from financial institutions while considering the “need to help families keep their homes and to stabilize communities.”  Put simply, many banks accepted billions in tax payer dollars to “help” families climb out of the mire left by the Great Recession.  But that is old news.

Pursuant to authority under these Acts and funded by TARP, the Making Home Affordable programs further compensated banks for “assisting” homeowners with mortgage modifications and other alternatives under buzzword programs like HAMP, HARP, and HAFA, to name a few.  The goal: incentivize banks to offer mortgage loan modifications, home price decline protection, and foreclosure alternatives, such as short sales or deed in lieu of foreclosure.  In short, the banks would complete a modification program for a borrower and then collect money from the Feds.  That is also old news.  While the assistance is available, courts have time and time again denied homeowners a remedy when banks violate the program guidelines and essentially deny federal assistance to those who qualify.

There is new news, however, and it is good.  In Montana, borrowers can essentially hold banks’ proverbial feet to the fire when those banks violate agreements under the federal programs.  In Morrow1, the plaintiffs received conflicting information from “customer service representatives.”  The plaintiffs alleged they were told to skip payments, to ignore default and acceleration notices, and to pay reduced amounts for a trial period.  The bank also told them they were approved for a federal modification.  In the end, the bank denied their modification plan and scheduled a trustee’s sale of their property.  The plaintiffs paid various amounts for 18 months under the guise they were keeping their house, just to see it sold out from under them.

The borrowers’ claimed the bank misrepresented the modification process, provided them conflicting information, and delayed the eligibility determination.  The Montana Supreme Court held that the bank owed the borrowers a duty to manage the modification process in a manner that would not cause loss or injury.  The Montana Court analyzed the HAMP guidelines to determine whether the borrowers alleged a breach of that duty.

The federal guidelines under the various programs, such as HAMP, HARP, or HAFA, may be used to determine whether a bank breached its duty to a borrower.  Ineffectual implementation of these guidelines may be sufficient to state a claim under the Montana Consumer Protection Act (MCPA).  Finally, material misrepresentations or outright fraudulent representations concerning these programs or a borrower’s application status under these programs may also be actionable under state law.  Good news for Montana consumers!

—-

1Morrow v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2014 MT 117.

Photo by Jeff Turner used under Creative Commons License

Bankruptcy,  Personal Injury

Take the Next Step

Get the Answers You Need to Move Forward

The team at Grizzly Law can help you make sense of your legal issues so you can finally have clarity on how to move forward with your case. Talk to an attorney now.

Start Here

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Montana Laws Governing Cyclists and Roadway Bicycling
  • Can the insurance company refuse to pay for my rental car after an accident?
  • Remote Texting Liability – I Would Take The Case
  • Liability for Texting A Driver
  • Go Check Your Auto Insurance!

Grizzly Law

1131 S Main St
Kalispell 59901
Phone: (406) 752-7122
Fax: (406) 752-3367
Henning, Rutz, and McCormack PLLC BBB Business Review
Free Personal Injury Consultation

Turn Your Setbacks Into Comebacks

Meet with Grizzly Law for a free case review. We'll evaluate your personal injury case and provide recommendations on next steps to get you moving forward.

Get Help Now

Footer

Quick Links

  • Montana Car Accident Guide
  • Contact Us
  • Educate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer

Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Lawyer
  • Auto Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accident
  • Slip and Fall
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Bicycle or Pedestrian Injury
  • Family Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Social Security Disability

Contact Us

1131 S Main St
Kalispell, MT 59901
Phone: (406) 752-7122
Fax: (406) 752-3367
Legal Counsel and Prosecution in Kalispell

The information presented on this website is not intended as and should not be interpreted as legal advice or legal opinion. Do not act or rely upon the information on this website without seeking the advice of an attorney.

Copyright © 2021 Grizzly Law · All Rights Reserved · Made in Montana by UpStart Media